<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mozilla didn&#8217;t reverse engineer OS X</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mbilf.com/2008/12/touchfox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mbilf.com/2008/12/touchfox/</link>
	<description>We couldn't think of any words that start with F...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 01:01:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jyoseph (Joseph)</title>
		<link>http://mbilf.com/2008/12/touchfox/comment-page-1/#comment-812</link>
		<dc:creator>jyoseph (Joseph)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 11:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mbilf.com/?p=165#comment-812</guid>
		<description>Mozilla DID NOT reverse-engineer OS X to enhance Firefox 3.1 (via Digg) http://mbilf.com/2008/12/touchfox/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mozilla DID NOT reverse-engineer OS X to enhance Firefox 3.1 (via Digg) <a href="http://mbilf.com/2008/12/touchfox/" rel="nofollow">http://mbilf.com/2008/12/touchfox/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
